Non2Writer

Glorifying consciousness itself or pigeonholing the brain helps no one.
Science cannot prove anything beyond its sight. And knowledge is always relative, never 100% complete. Because when do you know everything about everything?
But how much knowledge do you need when a light comes on in the darkness of your life?
When you awaken, all knowledge turns out to be superfluous. I am not talking about practical knowledge: for example, how to drive a car.
Therefore, true self-knowledge is not another person’s business but your own.
When the light comes on, who cares…?

The Buddha said: If you are hit by a poisoned arrow, you are not going to think about who shot the arrow, what wood the arrow is made of, how the arrow hit me, and what bird the arrow feathers came from. You are going to focus on the poison and the antidote.

But people are trying to make a science of consciousness and until then they live in darkness.
You don’t have to understand everything about electricity to flip a light switch.

And you don’t have to study the finger that points to the moon.

Jiddu Krishnamurti said at the end of his life that no one had understood him. Had it all been just entertainment, his presence?

All that esoteric knowledge, all that traditional philosophy, all that psychology, all that knowledge of others can get in the way of you seeing what you should and can see. Directly and without any doubt.